Saturday’s game against United was both brilliant and frustrating all at the same time.
An outstanding performance from Rovers all round with Samba and Jones proving colossal at the back, Jermaine Jones showing us he really is a quality midfielder (sign him up if possible) and dominating a nervous-looking United side for large periods of the game.
Before kick off I didn’t expect anything. I find it’s the best way to approach games like this to avoid disappointment. Keep expectations low and you cannot be upset by the outcome.
Then we started the way we did and went ahead after 20 minutes.
What followed was another West Ham. Seventy minutes of destroying finger nails.
Unfortunately, the inevitable happened and Manchester United were awarded a penalty.
A draw was the result both sides would have settled for before the game. But with Blackpool and Wolves winning, Rovers really needed the three points in the end.
The final 10 minutes, bizarre as they were, I can understand. I can see both sides of the argument and understand why some fans are outraged. But I can also see the side of the argument that says the point gained means Blackpool MUST win at Old Trafford/Birmingham MUST win at Spurs/Wigan MUST win at Stoke. Whereas had we gone on the attack and lost, a point for any of those sides could potentially take them above us (if we lose at Molineux).
What frustrated me most about the game was referee Phil Dowd. Now I don’t like to blame referees and get into the idea that referees cost games, but there was pure inconsistency on show from the man officiating this crucial fixture.
In the first 20 minutes, Jermaine Jones (I think) was booked for pulling Rooney’s shirt on the half way line. It was a first offence (again, I think). We went on to pick up more bookings.
Meanwhile, Nemanja Vidic committed at least two fouls and received nothing. I’m not saying they were necessarily bookings, but Phil Dowd set the bar by booking Jones for shirt-pulling, yet didn’t follow that decision up by being as strict with the United players.
My main gripe, however, is, as you may have assumed, the penalty. Now, I still haven’t seen any replays. I just have what I saw from my seat in the Blackburn End. Which is nothing.
I’m not disputing whether according to the rules it was a penalty or not.
What I am disputing is the fact that when Hernandez goes down, the referee doesn’t know if it’s a penalty. The linesman doesn’t flag, so he clearly doesn’t know it’s a penalty. However, having gone to the linesman and been surrounded by half of United’s squad, he awards the penalty.
How can this decision have been reached? How can the linesman, having not raised his flag, and the referee, having not blown for a foul, award a penalty using hindsight?
I sincerely hope the loss of two points in this game does not cost us our Premier League future. Mind you, I doubt Phil Dowd will lose any sleep.